TY - JOUR
T1 - Rheological properties of elastomeric impression materials for selective pressure impression technique
AU - Kawara, Misao
AU - Iwasaki, Masatoshi
AU - Iwata, Yoshihiro
AU - Komoda, Yoshihiro
AU - Inoue, Sayumi
AU - Komiyama, Osamu
AU - Suzuki, Hiroshi
AU - Kuroki, Toshikazu
AU - Hashizaki, Kaname
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Japan Prosthodontic Society.
PY - 2015/10
Y1 - 2015/10
N2 - Purpose: The selective impression technique is recommended for removable prosthodontics. However, the viscoelastic rheological properties of impression materials, particularly the time-dependent viscoelastic changes in impression material immediately after tray seating, are unknown. The objective of this study is to clarify the viscoelastic rheological properties of impression materials by focusing on tray seating. Methods: In this study, eight types of polyvinylsiloxane (PVS), two types of polyether, and two types of alginate impression materials were used. The storage modulus (G'; degree of stiffness) and loss tangent (tan δ; degree of hardening) were determined as functions of time from 0 to 360 s, commencing immediately after the completion of mixing, using a stress control-type rheometer. Thus, G' and tan δ at 0 s and 20 s were compared. Results: Stiffness was found to be widely distributed (4.49-0.26×104Pa) among PVS-types, even immediately after mixing the impression material. There was also variation among polyethers (1.55-0.5×104Pa) and among alginates (0.64-0.21×104Pa). The hardening of all impression materials progresses beyond 20s after the completion of mixing. Conclusions: The G' values varied with each impression material, even immediately after mixing, and the accurate impression-taking time was determined from the results of tan δ. These results provide unique insight into the selective impression technique.
AB - Purpose: The selective impression technique is recommended for removable prosthodontics. However, the viscoelastic rheological properties of impression materials, particularly the time-dependent viscoelastic changes in impression material immediately after tray seating, are unknown. The objective of this study is to clarify the viscoelastic rheological properties of impression materials by focusing on tray seating. Methods: In this study, eight types of polyvinylsiloxane (PVS), two types of polyether, and two types of alginate impression materials were used. The storage modulus (G'; degree of stiffness) and loss tangent (tan δ; degree of hardening) were determined as functions of time from 0 to 360 s, commencing immediately after the completion of mixing, using a stress control-type rheometer. Thus, G' and tan δ at 0 s and 20 s were compared. Results: Stiffness was found to be widely distributed (4.49-0.26×104Pa) among PVS-types, even immediately after mixing the impression material. There was also variation among polyethers (1.55-0.5×104Pa) and among alginates (0.64-0.21×104Pa). The hardening of all impression materials progresses beyond 20s after the completion of mixing. Conclusions: The G' values varied with each impression material, even immediately after mixing, and the accurate impression-taking time was determined from the results of tan δ. These results provide unique insight into the selective impression technique.
KW - Dynamic viscoelasticity
KW - Impression materials
KW - Removable denture
KW - Rheological properties
KW - Selective pressure impression
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944157600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.07.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.07.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 26283506
AN - SCOPUS:84944157600
SN - 1883-1958
VL - 59
SP - 254
EP - 261
JO - Journal of Prosthodontic Research
JF - Journal of Prosthodontic Research
IS - 4
ER -