TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationship between molar occlusion and masticatory movement in lateral deviation of the mandible
AU - Suzuki, Yuji
AU - Saitoh, Katsuhiko
AU - Imamura, Ryutaroh
AU - Ishii, Kaori
AU - Negishi, Shinichi
AU - Imamura, Ryuichi
AU - Yamaguchi, Masaru
AU - Kasai, Kazutaka
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Association of Orthodontists
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - Introduction The relationship between molar occlusion and chewing patterns was examined in subjects with laterally deviated mandibles. Methods Twenty-three patients with mandibular deviation from the midline (4 mm or more) and skeletal Class I (0° ≤ANB ≤4°) were divided into 2 groups: normal bite and crossbite. The chewing pattern was classified as normal, reversed, or crossover. Results The normal bite group had a normal chewing pattern on the affected side 100% of the time and a reversed chewing pattern on the affected and unaffected sides 0% and 7.2% of the time, respectively. Additionally, the normal bite group showed no evidence of a crossover chewing pattern and also had significantly less axial inclination of the mandibular teeth on the affected side compared with the crossbite group; lingual inclination was also evident. The crossbite group had a normal chewing pattern on the affected and unaffected sides 0% and 55.6% of the time, respectively, and reversed and crossover chewing patterns on the affected side 55.6% and 44.4% of the time, respectively. Conclusions A normal chewing pattern tends to result in lingual axial inclination of the mandibular molars on the affected side, as well as a more consistent chewing pattern.
AB - Introduction The relationship between molar occlusion and chewing patterns was examined in subjects with laterally deviated mandibles. Methods Twenty-three patients with mandibular deviation from the midline (4 mm or more) and skeletal Class I (0° ≤ANB ≤4°) were divided into 2 groups: normal bite and crossbite. The chewing pattern was classified as normal, reversed, or crossover. Results The normal bite group had a normal chewing pattern on the affected side 100% of the time and a reversed chewing pattern on the affected and unaffected sides 0% and 7.2% of the time, respectively. Additionally, the normal bite group showed no evidence of a crossover chewing pattern and also had significantly less axial inclination of the mandibular teeth on the affected side compared with the crossbite group; lingual inclination was also evident. The crossbite group had a normal chewing pattern on the affected and unaffected sides 0% and 55.6% of the time, respectively, and reversed and crossover chewing patterns on the affected side 55.6% and 44.4% of the time, respectively. Conclusions A normal chewing pattern tends to result in lingual axial inclination of the mandibular molars on the affected side, as well as a more consistent chewing pattern.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020059269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.11.023
DO - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.11.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 28554459
AN - SCOPUS:85020059269
SN - 0889-5406
VL - 151
SP - 1139
EP - 1147
JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
IS - 6
ER -