TY - JOUR
T1 - Pressure dynamics in the trays caused by differences of the various impression materials and thickness of the relief in the maxillary edentulous model
AU - Iwasaki, Masatoshi
AU - Kawara, Misao
AU - Inoue, Sayumi
AU - Komiyama, Osamu
AU - Iida, Takashi
AU - Asano, Takashi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Japan Prosthodontic Society.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the pressure dynamics in the trays caused by differences in the various impression materials and in the thickness of the relief provided for the trays. Methods: In this study, two types of polyvinylsiloxane elastomers, one type of polyether elastomer and one type of alginate impression material were used. Pressure sensors were embedded at eight locations in a model of an edentulous maxilla, and used a simulation model covered with a pseudomucosa. For each impression material, the measurement was performed five times for each of the three types of trays, and the mean values were determined. Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way analysis of variance and the Tukey's HDS method, and the various pressure sensor values for each of the impression materials were compared 10 s and 20 s after the start of the measurement. Additionally, we compared differences among the three types of trays after 20 s. Results: The pressure values for sensors placed in the relief region tended to become uniform. Furthermore, we saw a tendency for the pressure to increase at the alveolar crests of the first molars on the left and right and at the posterior border of the palate, all of which support the denture, when relief was provided. Conclusions: The above results suggest that making the final impression for the denture using the selective pressure technique, with consideration given to the pressure dynamic, may lead to a good outcome in terms of preservation of the alveolar ridge.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the pressure dynamics in the trays caused by differences in the various impression materials and in the thickness of the relief provided for the trays. Methods: In this study, two types of polyvinylsiloxane elastomers, one type of polyether elastomer and one type of alginate impression material were used. Pressure sensors were embedded at eight locations in a model of an edentulous maxilla, and used a simulation model covered with a pseudomucosa. For each impression material, the measurement was performed five times for each of the three types of trays, and the mean values were determined. Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way analysis of variance and the Tukey's HDS method, and the various pressure sensor values for each of the impression materials were compared 10 s and 20 s after the start of the measurement. Additionally, we compared differences among the three types of trays after 20 s. Results: The pressure values for sensors placed in the relief region tended to become uniform. Furthermore, we saw a tendency for the pressure to increase at the alveolar crests of the first molars on the left and right and at the posterior border of the palate, all of which support the denture, when relief was provided. Conclusions: The above results suggest that making the final impression for the denture using the selective pressure technique, with consideration given to the pressure dynamic, may lead to a good outcome in terms of preservation of the alveolar ridge.
KW - Impression material
KW - Impression pressure
KW - Removable denture
KW - Selective pressure impression
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955327797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.11.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.11.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 26803561
AN - SCOPUS:84955327797
SN - 1883-1958
VL - 60
SP - 123
EP - 130
JO - Journal of Prosthodontic Research
JF - Journal of Prosthodontic Research
IS - 2
ER -