TY - JOUR
T1 - Influences of differences in tray design and impression material on impression pressure at edentulous mandible
AU - Inoue, Sayumi
AU - Kawara, Misao
AU - Iida, Takashi
AU - Iwasaki, Masatoshi
AU - Komiyama, Osamu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Nihon University, School of Dentistry. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - The aim of this study was to examine the effects of tray design and impression material on impression pressure in a clinical simulation model of an edentulous mandible. Two types of polyvinyl-siloxane elastomer, one type of polyether elastomer, and one type of alginate were used. The three tray types had no relief, 0.36 mm of relief, or 1.4 mm of relief, with or without escape holes. Impression pressure was measured at the median alveolar crest, the bilateral alveolar crests corresponding to molars, and the bilateral buccal shelves. Impression pressure significantly differed in relation to tray design and sensor position. In trays without escape holes, impression pressure was highest at the median alveolar crest and lowest at the buccal shelves, for all impression materials. However, impression material had no significant effects on impression pressure. Our results suggest that bite-pressure load on alveolar crests can be alleviated by making an impression with a tray that has relief and escape holes, while applying pressure to buccal shelves and almost no pressure to alveolar crests.
AB - The aim of this study was to examine the effects of tray design and impression material on impression pressure in a clinical simulation model of an edentulous mandible. Two types of polyvinyl-siloxane elastomer, one type of polyether elastomer, and one type of alginate were used. The three tray types had no relief, 0.36 mm of relief, or 1.4 mm of relief, with or without escape holes. Impression pressure was measured at the median alveolar crest, the bilateral alveolar crests corresponding to molars, and the bilateral buccal shelves. Impression pressure significantly differed in relation to tray design and sensor position. In trays without escape holes, impression pressure was highest at the median alveolar crest and lowest at the buccal shelves, for all impression materials. However, impression material had no significant effects on impression pressure. Our results suggest that bite-pressure load on alveolar crests can be alleviated by making an impression with a tray that has relief and escape holes, while applying pressure to buccal shelves and almost no pressure to alveolar crests.
KW - Edentulous impression
KW - Impression pressure
KW - Selective pressure impression
KW - Tray design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040056308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2334/josnusd.16-0731
DO - 10.2334/josnusd.16-0731
M3 - Article
C2 - 28855443
AN - SCOPUS:85040056308
SN - 1343-4934
VL - 59
SP - 505
EP - 510
JO - Journal of Oral Science
JF - Journal of Oral Science
IS - 4
ER -