TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of soft denture liners on complete denture treatments
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Hasegawa, Yoko
AU - Minakuchi, Hajime
AU - Nishimura, Masahiro
AU - Nishio, Kensuke
AU - Yoshioka, Fumi
AU - Ishii, Tomohiro
AU - Watanabe, Takafumi
AU - Nishiyama, Yuichiro
AU - Sato, Yusuke
AU - Yoshida, Kazuhiro
AU - Sta. Maria, Ma Therese
AU - Iinuma, Toshimitsu
AU - Matsuka, Yoshizo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Japan Prosthodontic Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Purpose: This systematic review examined the effectiveness of soft denture relining (SDR) materials. Study selection: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ICHUSHI was conducted up to July 26, 2020. Target outcomes were patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL), masticatory ability (MA), denture functional duration, residual ridge resorption (RRR), and microbial contamination. An organization specializing in literature searches performed the reference searches, and two reviewers independently selected the literature sources, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. The reviewers resolved any disagreements concerning the assortment of literature sources through discussion. SDR included acrylic-and silicone-based materials, which were evaluated separately. Results: Reviewers selected 7, 5, 11, 1, 4, and 6 studies to assess patient satisfaction, OHRQOL, MA, functional duration, RRR, and microbial contamination, respectively. The results confirmed that SDR improved patient satisfaction, OHRQOL, MA, and RRR. However, the functional duration of SDR material is shorter than that of hard denture relining (HDR) or acrylic resin material. Furthermore, SDR material is more susceptible to microbial contamination in the long term. The risk of bias for the included studies tended to be high because of specific issues (difficulty in blinding SDR versus HDR). Conclusions: For patients who wear complete dentures, SDR often provides beneficial outcomes such as pain reduction and recovery from MA. However, caution should be exercised regarding their use owing to insufficient functional duration and the possibility of microbial contamination during long-term use.
AB - Purpose: This systematic review examined the effectiveness of soft denture relining (SDR) materials. Study selection: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ICHUSHI was conducted up to July 26, 2020. Target outcomes were patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL), masticatory ability (MA), denture functional duration, residual ridge resorption (RRR), and microbial contamination. An organization specializing in literature searches performed the reference searches, and two reviewers independently selected the literature sources, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. The reviewers resolved any disagreements concerning the assortment of literature sources through discussion. SDR included acrylic-and silicone-based materials, which were evaluated separately. Results: Reviewers selected 7, 5, 11, 1, 4, and 6 studies to assess patient satisfaction, OHRQOL, MA, functional duration, RRR, and microbial contamination, respectively. The results confirmed that SDR improved patient satisfaction, OHRQOL, MA, and RRR. However, the functional duration of SDR material is shorter than that of hard denture relining (HDR) or acrylic resin material. Furthermore, SDR material is more susceptible to microbial contamination in the long term. The risk of bias for the included studies tended to be high because of specific issues (difficulty in blinding SDR versus HDR). Conclusions: For patients who wear complete dentures, SDR often provides beneficial outcomes such as pain reduction and recovery from MA. However, caution should be exercised regarding their use owing to insufficient functional duration and the possibility of microbial contamination during long-term use.
KW - Complete denture
KW - Denture reline
KW - Reline
KW - Soft relining material
KW - Systematic review
KW - Treatment outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206707401&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00067
DO - 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00067
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38382972
AN - SCOPUS:85206707401
SN - 1883-1958
VL - 68
SP - 493
EP - 510
JO - Journal of Prosthodontic Research
JF - Journal of Prosthodontic Research
IS - 4
ER -