Comparison between CT volumetry and extracellular volume fraction using liver dynamic CT for the predictive ability of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Kenichiro Tago
  • , Jitsuro Tsukada
  • , Naohiro Sudo
  • , Kazu Shibutani
  • , Masahiro Okada
  • , Hayato Abe
  • , Kenji Ibukuro
  • , Tokio Higaki
  • , Tadatoshi Takayama

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿記事査読

32 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

Objectives: To compare the predictive ability of liver fibrosis (LF) by CT-volumetry (CTV) for liver and spleen and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) for liver in patients undergoing liver resection. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 90 consecutive patients who underwent CTV and ECV. Manually placed region-of-interest ECV (manual-ECV), rigid-registration ECV (rigid-ECV), and nonrigid-registration ECV (nonrigid-ECV) were calculated as ECV(%) = (1-haematocrit) × (ΔHUliver/ΔHUaorta), where ΔHU = subtraction of unenhanced phase from equilibrium phase (240 s). Manual-ECV was compared with CTV for the estimation of LF. The total liver volume to body surface area (TLV/BSA), splenic volume to BSA (SV/BSA), ratio of TLV to SV (TLV/SV), ratio of right liver volume to SV (RV/SV), and liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR) were measured. ROC analyses were performed for ECV and CTV. Results: After excluding 10 patients, seventy-eight (97.5%) out of 80 patients had a Child-Pugh score of 5 points, and two (2.5%) patients had a Child-Pugh score of 6 points. AUC of ECV showed no significant difference among manual-ECV, rigid-ECV, and nonrigid-ECV. TLV/BSA, SV/BSA, TLV/SV, and RV/SV had a higher correlation with LF grades than manual-ECV. AUC of SV/BSA was significantly higher than that of manual-ECV in F0-1 vs F2-4 and F0-2 vs F3-4. AUC of SV/BSA (0.76–0.83) was higher than that of manual-ECV (0.61–0.75) for all LF grades, although manual-ECV could differentiate between F0-3 and F4 at high AUC (0.75). Conclusions: In patients undergoing liver resection, SV/BSA is a better method for estimating severe LF grades, although manual-ECV has the ability to estimate cirrhosis (≥ F4). Key Points: The splenic volume is a better method for estimating liver fibrosis grades.The extracellular volume fraction is also a candidate for the estimation of severe liver fibrosis.

本文言語英語
ページ(範囲)7555-7565
ページ数11
ジャーナルEuropean Radiology
32
11
DOI
出版ステータス出版済み - 11月 2022

フィンガープリント

「Comparison between CT volumetry and extracellular volume fraction using liver dynamic CT for the predictive ability of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル