TY - JOUR
T1 - Vertical magnification correction in vertical dual-exposure panoramic radiography
AU - Kimoto, Hideaki
AU - Asakura, Shoichi
AU - Sasaki, Tatsuhiko
AU - Dezawa, Ko
AU - Amemiya, Toshihiko
AU - Matsumoto, Kunihito
AU - Arai, Yoshinori
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Nihon University School of Dentistry.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Purpose: To clarify the magnification error caused by the degree of tilt of the incisor and the elevation of the X-ray focus position, and the verification effect of magnification correction when performing vertical dual-exposure panoramic radiography. Methods: Panoramic radiographic images of a phantom embedding 26 steel balls were taken at different heights (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm) and tilt angles (0°, 10°, 20°, and 30°) to evaluate vertical magnification in each condition. Error and correlation coefficients in the vertical magnifications were calculated between the measured and theoretical magnification values. Results: The more the steel ball phantom was tilted, the more the images of the uppermost steel balls were laterally stretched. In the vertical direction, image magnification also influenced the tilt angle of the object in the incisal region. The range of error in vertical magnification was −0.350.30%. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between the measured and theoretical magnification value was 0.983. Conclusion: Vertical magnification correction has the potential to improve image quality when merging panoramic radiographs in vertical dualexposure panoramic radiography.
AB - Purpose: To clarify the magnification error caused by the degree of tilt of the incisor and the elevation of the X-ray focus position, and the verification effect of magnification correction when performing vertical dual-exposure panoramic radiography. Methods: Panoramic radiographic images of a phantom embedding 26 steel balls were taken at different heights (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm) and tilt angles (0°, 10°, 20°, and 30°) to evaluate vertical magnification in each condition. Error and correlation coefficients in the vertical magnifications were calculated between the measured and theoretical magnification values. Results: The more the steel ball phantom was tilted, the more the images of the uppermost steel balls were laterally stretched. In the vertical direction, image magnification also influenced the tilt angle of the object in the incisal region. The range of error in vertical magnification was −0.350.30%. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between the measured and theoretical magnification value was 0.983. Conclusion: Vertical magnification correction has the potential to improve image quality when merging panoramic radiographs in vertical dualexposure panoramic radiography.
KW - ghost image
KW - image merging
KW - magnification correction
KW - panoramic radiography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182768687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2334/josnusd.23-0387
DO - 10.2334/josnusd.23-0387
M3 - Article
C2 - 38233158
AN - SCOPUS:85182768687
SN - 1343-4934
VL - 66
SP - 70
EP - 74
JO - Journal of Oral Science
JF - Journal of Oral Science
IS - 1
ER -