Success rate of breast conserving surgery for different breast cancer screening methods

  • Kenichi Sakurai
  • , Shigeru Fujisaki
  • , Saki Nagashima
  • , Tetsuyo Maeda
  • , Ryouichi Tomita
  • , Shuhei Suzuki
  • , Yukiko Hara
  • , Tomohiro Hirano
  • , Katsuhisa Enomoto
  • , Sadao Amano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We evaluated the significance of the success rate of breast conserving surgery in patients with breast cancer discovered by using different screening methods. Patients underwent either population-based screening (group A) or opportunistic screening (group B). We retrospectively investigated patients who visited our hospital in 2012. A total of 552 patients visited our hospital for breast cancer screening. Thirty-five percent of these patients were diagnosed with breast cancer based on the histopathological results. The rate of breast cancer discovery was significantly higher in group B than in group A. The rate of discovery of early clinical stage breast cancer was also higher in group B than in group A. The rate of total breast conserving surgery for breast cancer screening cases was 54.4%. The rate of breast conserving surgery was higher in group B than in group A. Group A patients only underwent mammography, while 80.1% of group B patients underwent mammography plus ultrasonography. These results suggest that adding ultrasonography to breast cancer screening is useful for detection of early breast cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1890-1891
Number of pages2
JournalJapanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy
Volume41
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Breast cancer screening
  • Breast conserving surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Success rate of breast conserving surgery for different breast cancer screening methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this