Abstract
We evaluated the significance of the success rate of breast conserving surgery in patients with breast cancer discovered by using different screening methods. Patients underwent either population-based screening (group A) or opportunistic screening (group B). We retrospectively investigated patients who visited our hospital in 2012. A total of 552 patients visited our hospital for breast cancer screening. Thirty-five percent of these patients were diagnosed with breast cancer based on the histopathological results. The rate of breast cancer discovery was significantly higher in group B than in group A. The rate of discovery of early clinical stage breast cancer was also higher in group B than in group A. The rate of total breast conserving surgery for breast cancer screening cases was 54.4%. The rate of breast conserving surgery was higher in group B than in group A. Group A patients only underwent mammography, while 80.1% of group B patients underwent mammography plus ultrasonography. These results suggest that adding ultrasonography to breast cancer screening is useful for detection of early breast cancer.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1890-1891 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Breast cancer
- Breast cancer screening
- Breast conserving surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Success rate of breast conserving surgery for different breast cancer screening methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver