Sensitometric comparison of direct- and indirect-exposure films used in intraoral radiography.

K. Hashimoto, K. H. Thunthy, K. Iwai, K. Ejima, R. Weinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Japan, some dentists use indirect-exposure (screen) films for intraoral radiography, without the use of intensifying screens. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether film speed, inherent contrast, and latitude of Japanese indirect-exposure films used without intensifying screens were comparable to those of direct-exposure (non-screen) films used for intraoral radiography. The characteristic curves of Kodak Ektaspeed ("E" speed) and Ultra-speed ("D" speed) films were used as standards for comparison. Indirect-exposure films without intensifying screens were extremely slow compared with direct-exposure "E" and "D" speed films. Therefore, they should not be used for intraoral radiography because they needlessly expose the patient to excessive X-ray radiation. The direct-exposure films Hanshin Hi-Fi and Hanshin New Silver were equivalent in speed, higher in contrast, and narrower in latitude than Kodak Ektaspeed film. In general, the indirect-exposure films had lower speed, lower contrast and wider latitude than the direct-exposure films. Their speed and contrast would have been increased if intensifying screens had been used. Therefore, indirect-exposure films without intensifying screens should not be used for intraoral radiography.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-110
Number of pages5
JournalThe Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1992

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitometric comparison of direct- and indirect-exposure films used in intraoral radiography.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this