TY - JOUR
T1 - Second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer
T2 - a single center, retrospective analysis of 294 cases
AU - Takahara, Naminatsu
AU - Nakai, Yousuke
AU - Isayama, Hiroyuki
AU - Sasaki, Takashi
AU - Saito, Kei
AU - Oyama, Hiroki
AU - Kanai, Sachiko
AU - Suzuki, Tatsunori
AU - Sato, Tatsuya
AU - Hakuta, Ryunosuke
AU - Ishigaki, Kazunaga
AU - Takeda, Tsuyoshi
AU - Saito, Tomotaka
AU - Mizuno, Suguru
AU - Kogure, Hirofumi
AU - Tada, Minoru
AU - Koike, Kazuhiko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - Purpose The survival benefit of first-line chemotherapy (CT1) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) is now established but the role of second-line chemotherapy (CT2) has not been fully elucidated yet. Methods Consecutive advanced BTC patients receiving CT1 between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively studied. We investigated the safety and efficacy of CT2, prognostic factors for residual survival after CT1, and explored subgroups who would benefit from CT2. Results Among 294 patients receiving CT1 for advanced BTC, CT2 was given in 139 patients (47%). CT2 provided a response rate of 4%, a disease control rate of 52%, a median progression-free survival of 2.8 and overall survival of 7.7 months, respectively. CT2 was associated with longer residual survival after CT1 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, p < 0.01), as well as PS of 0–1 (HR 0.53, p < 0.01), best response to CT1 of PD (HR 1.46, p = 0.01), and CEA ≥5.0 ng/mL (HR 1.69, p < 0.01). The effects of CT2 were homogeneous across almost all subgroups but were more prominent in patients with age ≥ 70 years (HR 0.32, p for interaction =0.02), CA19–9 ≥ 200 IU/mL (HR 0.41, p for interaction = 0.08) and CEA ≥5.0 ng/mL (HR 0.41, p for interaction = 0.06). Conclusions The introduction rate of CT2 was 47%. Although the efficacy of CT2 was modest in terms of tumor response, it was associated with better survival. Further investigations are necessary both to develop more effective regimens and to select patients who will benefit from CT2.
AB - Purpose The survival benefit of first-line chemotherapy (CT1) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) is now established but the role of second-line chemotherapy (CT2) has not been fully elucidated yet. Methods Consecutive advanced BTC patients receiving CT1 between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively studied. We investigated the safety and efficacy of CT2, prognostic factors for residual survival after CT1, and explored subgroups who would benefit from CT2. Results Among 294 patients receiving CT1 for advanced BTC, CT2 was given in 139 patients (47%). CT2 provided a response rate of 4%, a disease control rate of 52%, a median progression-free survival of 2.8 and overall survival of 7.7 months, respectively. CT2 was associated with longer residual survival after CT1 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, p < 0.01), as well as PS of 0–1 (HR 0.53, p < 0.01), best response to CT1 of PD (HR 1.46, p = 0.01), and CEA ≥5.0 ng/mL (HR 1.69, p < 0.01). The effects of CT2 were homogeneous across almost all subgroups but were more prominent in patients with age ≥ 70 years (HR 0.32, p for interaction =0.02), CA19–9 ≥ 200 IU/mL (HR 0.41, p for interaction = 0.08) and CEA ≥5.0 ng/mL (HR 0.41, p for interaction = 0.06). Conclusions The introduction rate of CT2 was 47%. Although the efficacy of CT2 was modest in terms of tumor response, it was associated with better survival. Further investigations are necessary both to develop more effective regimens and to select patients who will benefit from CT2.
KW - Biliary tract cancer
KW - Prognostic factors
KW - Retrospective study
KW - Second-line chemotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055504006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10637-018-0670-1
DO - 10.1007/s10637-018-0670-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 30324343
AN - SCOPUS:85055504006
SN - 0167-6997
VL - 36
SP - 1093
EP - 1102
JO - Investigational New Drugs
JF - Investigational New Drugs
IS - 6
ER -