TY - JOUR
T1 - Observation of bone healing after Le Fort I osteotomy with tuberosity separation
AU - Koeda, Satoko
AU - Nakamura, Atsushi
AU - Yamamura, Makiko
AU - Akiyama, Hiroki
AU - Ishii, Sigeru
AU - Ogisawa, Shouhei
AU - Shirota, Tatsuo
AU - Nishikubo, Shuichi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Asian AOMS, ASOMP, JSOP, JSOMS, JSOM, and JAMI
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective: This study aimed to examine bone healing after Le Fort I (LFI) osteotomy with tuberosity separation. Methods: Twenty patients who had undergone maxillary advance and clockwise rotation for skeletal class III malocclusion were included. LFI osteotomy with tuberosity separation was performed on the patients. The osteotomized maxilla was fixed to the piriform rim using bioabsorbable plates and to the zygomatic buttress using titanium miniplates (thickness: 0.6 mm). Computed tomography (CT) images were taken after 2 months (T1) and > 10 months (T2) of surgery. The piriform rim, maxillary sinus anterior wall, zygomatic buttress, and maxillary tuberosity were evaluated on a four-point scale: bone resorption (−2), no bone contact (−1), bone contact (0), and bone continuity (1). Results: The average total scores for each site were as follows: maxillary tuberosity, 0.5 ± 0.4 (T1) and 1.0 ± 1.2 (T2); zygomatic buttress, −0.6 ± 0.6 (T1) and 0.1 ± 0.9 (T2); maxillary sinus anterior wall, −0.9 ± −0.6 (T1) and −0.3 ± 2.0 (T2); and aperture piriform rim, −0.5 ± 0.8 (T1) and 0.9 ± 1.5 (T2). The score increased significantly at all sites at T2 (p < 0.001). The CT values in the tuberosity site were 347.6 ± 134.1 at T1 and 418.8 ± 161.4. Conclusions: The maxillary tuberosity showed the earliest evidence of bone continuity.
AB - Objective: This study aimed to examine bone healing after Le Fort I (LFI) osteotomy with tuberosity separation. Methods: Twenty patients who had undergone maxillary advance and clockwise rotation for skeletal class III malocclusion were included. LFI osteotomy with tuberosity separation was performed on the patients. The osteotomized maxilla was fixed to the piriform rim using bioabsorbable plates and to the zygomatic buttress using titanium miniplates (thickness: 0.6 mm). Computed tomography (CT) images were taken after 2 months (T1) and > 10 months (T2) of surgery. The piriform rim, maxillary sinus anterior wall, zygomatic buttress, and maxillary tuberosity were evaluated on a four-point scale: bone resorption (−2), no bone contact (−1), bone contact (0), and bone continuity (1). Results: The average total scores for each site were as follows: maxillary tuberosity, 0.5 ± 0.4 (T1) and 1.0 ± 1.2 (T2); zygomatic buttress, −0.6 ± 0.6 (T1) and 0.1 ± 0.9 (T2); maxillary sinus anterior wall, −0.9 ± −0.6 (T1) and −0.3 ± 2.0 (T2); and aperture piriform rim, −0.5 ± 0.8 (T1) and 0.9 ± 1.5 (T2). The score increased significantly at all sites at T2 (p < 0.001). The CT values in the tuberosity site were 347.6 ± 134.1 at T1 and 418.8 ± 161.4. Conclusions: The maxillary tuberosity showed the earliest evidence of bone continuity.
KW - Bone healing
KW - Clockwise rotation
KW - CT value
KW - Fixation
KW - Tuberosity separation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014029142
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajoms.2025.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.ajoms.2025.08.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105014029142
SN - 2212-5558
JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology
JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology
ER -