TY - JOUR
T1 - Mycophenolate Mofetil after Rituximab for Childhood-Onset Complicated Frequently-Relapsing or Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome
AU - on behalf of Japanese Study Group of Kidney Disease in Children
AU - Iijima, Kazumoto
AU - Sako, Mayumi
AU - Oba, Mari
AU - Tanaka, Seiji
AU - Hamada, Riku
AU - Sakai, Tomoyuki
AU - Ohwada, Yoko
AU - Ninchoji, Takeshi
AU - Yamamura, Tomohiko
AU - Machida, Hiroyuki
AU - Shima, Yuko
AU - Tanaka, Ryojiro
AU - Kaito, Hiroshi
AU - Araki, Yoshinori
AU - Morohashi, Tamaki
AU - Kumagai, Naonori
AU - Gotoh, Yoshimitsu
AU - Ikezumi, Yohei
AU - Kubota, Takuo
AU - Kamei, Koichi
AU - Fujita, Naoya
AU - Ohtsuka, Yasufumi
AU - Okamoto, Takayuki
AU - Yamada, Takeshi
AU - Tanaka, Eriko
AU - Shimizu, Masaki
AU - Horinochi, Tomoko
AU - Konishi, Akihide
AU - Omori, Takashi
AU - Nakanishi, Koichi
AU - Ishikura, Kenji
AU - Ito, Shuichi
AU - Nakamura, Hidefumi
AU - Nozu, Kandai
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
ß 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Background Rituximab is the standard therapy for childhood-onset complicated frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS). However, most patients redevelop FRNS/SDNS after peripheral B cell recovery. Methods We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to examine whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) administration after rituximab can prevent treatment failure (FRNS, SDNS, steroid resistance, or use of immunosuppressive agents or rituximab). In total, 39 patients (per group) were treated with rituximab, followed by either MMF or placebo until day 505 (treatment period). The primary outcome was time to treatment failure (TTF) throughout the treatment and follow-up periods (until day 505 for the last enrolled patient). Results TTFs were clinically but not statistically significantly longer among patients given MMF after rituximab than among patients receiving rituximab monotherapy (median, 784.0 versus 472.5 days, hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.34 to 1.05, log-rank test: P50.07). Because most patients in the MMF group presented with treatment failure after MMF discontinuation, we performed a post-hoc analysis limited to the treatment period and found that MMF after rituximab prolonged the TTF and decreased the risk of treatment failure by 80% (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.50). Moreover, MMF after rituximab reduced the relapse rate and daily steroid dose during the treatment period by 74% and 57%, respectively. The frequency and severity of adverse events were similar in both groups. Conclusions Administration of MMF after rituximab may sufficiently prevent the development of treatment failure and is well tolerated, although the relapse-preventing effect disappears after MMF discontinuation.
AB - Background Rituximab is the standard therapy for childhood-onset complicated frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS). However, most patients redevelop FRNS/SDNS after peripheral B cell recovery. Methods We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to examine whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) administration after rituximab can prevent treatment failure (FRNS, SDNS, steroid resistance, or use of immunosuppressive agents or rituximab). In total, 39 patients (per group) were treated with rituximab, followed by either MMF or placebo until day 505 (treatment period). The primary outcome was time to treatment failure (TTF) throughout the treatment and follow-up periods (until day 505 for the last enrolled patient). Results TTFs were clinically but not statistically significantly longer among patients given MMF after rituximab than among patients receiving rituximab monotherapy (median, 784.0 versus 472.5 days, hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.34 to 1.05, log-rank test: P50.07). Because most patients in the MMF group presented with treatment failure after MMF discontinuation, we performed a post-hoc analysis limited to the treatment period and found that MMF after rituximab prolonged the TTF and decreased the risk of treatment failure by 80% (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.50). Moreover, MMF after rituximab reduced the relapse rate and daily steroid dose during the treatment period by 74% and 57%, respectively. The frequency and severity of adverse events were similar in both groups. Conclusions Administration of MMF after rituximab may sufficiently prevent the development of treatment failure and is well tolerated, although the relapse-preventing effect disappears after MMF discontinuation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123969508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1681/ASN.2021050643
DO - 10.1681/ASN.2021050643
M3 - Article
C2 - 34880074
AN - SCOPUS:85123969508
SN - 1046-6673
VL - 33
SP - 401
EP - 419
JO - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
JF - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
IS - 2
ER -