Influence of anti-HBc seropositivity on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV-infected patients after adjusting for confounding factors

T. Ohki, R. Tateishi, E. Goto, T. Sato, R. Masuzaki, J. Imamura, T. Goto, F. Kanai, N. Kato, S. Shiina, H. Yoshida, T. Kawabe, M. Omata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is controversial whether past hepatitis B virus infection constitutes an additional risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV). The incidence of HCC between 1994 and 2004 was analysed among 1262 patients who were only positive for HCV. The cumulative incidence of HCC was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the difference between two groups was assessed by the log-rank test. The effect of anti-HBc positivity on the risk of HCC was assessed with multivariate Cox proportional analysis. Anti-HBc was positive in 522 (41.4%) patients. The proportion of male patients (56.7 vs 46.8%, P < 0.001) and mean age (60.8 vs 56.9 years, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the anti-HBc positive group. HCC developed in 339 patients (mean follow-up 7.0 years), with cumulative incidence rates at 3, 5 and 10 years of 12.7, 24.5 and 41.9% in the anti-HBc positive group and 10.6, 17.7 and 33.4% in the negative group, respectively (P = 0.005). However, anti-HBc seropositivity did not reach statistical significance in multivariate analysis including age and gender (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.85-1.31; P = 0.63). Anti-HBc positivity and HCC incidence were confounded by male gender and older age.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-97
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Viral Hepatitis
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anti-HBC
  • Chronic hepatitis C
  • HCV
  • Occult HBV infection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of anti-HBc seropositivity on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV-infected patients after adjusting for confounding factors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this