TY - JOUR
T1 - Impella effects on reverse myocardial remodeling in anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction
T2 - insights from a comprehensive analysis of acute and chronic MRI findings
AU - Fukamachi, Daisuke
AU - Yamada, Akimasa
AU - Takahashi, Kurara
AU - Sumida, Ran
AU - Tanaka, Yudai
AU - Migita, Shohei
AU - Mizobuchi, Saki
AU - Miyagawa, Masatsugu
AU - Fujito, Hidesato
AU - Koyama, Yutaka
AU - Oogaku, Akihito
AU - Fukumoto, Katsunori
AU - Arai, Riku
AU - Ebuchi, Yasunari
AU - Monden, Masaki
AU - Morikawa, Tomoyuki
AU - Mineki, Takashi
AU - Kojima, Keisuke
AU - Murata, Nobuhiro
AU - Sudo, Mitsumasa
AU - Kitano, Daisuke
AU - Matsumoto, Naoya
AU - Okumura, Yasuo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Late adverse myocardial remodeling after ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is strongly associated with cardiac death. Global Longitudinal strain (GLS) and circumferential diastolic strain rate (CDSR) derived cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is a powerful predictor of late myocardial remodeling. However, the Impella’s effects on CMRI after STEMI are not fully understood. Research design and methods: We retrospectively compared the CMRI in the acute (18 [14–22] vs. 14 [6–22] days, p = 0.43) and chronic phases (118 [102–242] vs. 117 [101–202] days, p = 1.0) after anterior STEMI. Results: Five patients received Impella before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and seven underwent intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP). There were no significant differences in the peak creatine kinase levels (2595 [2069 -12,932] vs. 4372 [2941–5601] IU/L, p = 0.76) and LVEF upon admission (51 ± 11 vs. 50 ± 9%, p = 1.0). The Impella group had significantly better acute CMRI-derived LVEF (49 ± 10 vs. 35 ± 7%, p = 0.02) and CDSR (0.9 ± 0.2 vs. 0.5 ± 0.3 s− 1, p = 0.018). In the chronic phase, the CMRI-derived LVEF and GLS were significantly higher in the Impella group (54 ± 9 vs. 39 ± 5%, p = 0.01; −9.9 ± 1.3 vs. −6.5 ± 2.2%, p = 0.01). Conclusions: The Impella implantation led to better LVEF and CDSR in the acute phase than IABP and better maintenance of both the LVEF and GLS through the chronic phase.
AB - Background: Late adverse myocardial remodeling after ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is strongly associated with cardiac death. Global Longitudinal strain (GLS) and circumferential diastolic strain rate (CDSR) derived cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is a powerful predictor of late myocardial remodeling. However, the Impella’s effects on CMRI after STEMI are not fully understood. Research design and methods: We retrospectively compared the CMRI in the acute (18 [14–22] vs. 14 [6–22] days, p = 0.43) and chronic phases (118 [102–242] vs. 117 [101–202] days, p = 1.0) after anterior STEMI. Results: Five patients received Impella before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and seven underwent intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP). There were no significant differences in the peak creatine kinase levels (2595 [2069 -12,932] vs. 4372 [2941–5601] IU/L, p = 0.76) and LVEF upon admission (51 ± 11 vs. 50 ± 9%, p = 1.0). The Impella group had significantly better acute CMRI-derived LVEF (49 ± 10 vs. 35 ± 7%, p = 0.02) and CDSR (0.9 ± 0.2 vs. 0.5 ± 0.3 s− 1, p = 0.018). In the chronic phase, the CMRI-derived LVEF and GLS were significantly higher in the Impella group (54 ± 9 vs. 39 ± 5%, p = 0.01; −9.9 ± 1.3 vs. −6.5 ± 2.2%, p = 0.01). Conclusions: The Impella implantation led to better LVEF and CDSR in the acute phase than IABP and better maintenance of both the LVEF and GLS through the chronic phase.
KW - Anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction
KW - cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Impella
KW - intra-aortic balloon pumping
KW - reverse remodeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000174575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14779072.2025.2476129
DO - 10.1080/14779072.2025.2476129
M3 - Article
C2 - 40057464
AN - SCOPUS:105000174575
SN - 1477-9072
VL - 23
SP - 97
EP - 105
JO - Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
JF - Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
IS - 3
ER -