TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and recovery of remimazolam versus midazolam in sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
T2 - a multicenter randomized controlled trial in Japan (RECOVER Study)
AU - Yamaguchi, Daisuke
AU - Ichijima, Ryoji
AU - Ikehara, Hisatomo
AU - Minoda, Yosuke
AU - Esaki, Mitsuru
AU - Takamori, Ayako
AU - Yoh, Akiyoshi
AU - Shirouzu, Moeko
AU - Sadashima, Kento
AU - Fujimura, Yutaro
AU - Shimamura, Takuya
AU - Takedomi, Hironobu
AU - Akutagawa, Takashi
AU - Tsuruoka, Nanae
AU - Sakata, Yasuhisa
AU - Wada, Takuya
AU - Kusano, Chika
AU - Shimoda, Ryo
AU - Esaki, Motohiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objectives: Sedation is increasingly essential for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, has a shorter pharmacokinetic half-life than midazolam. The aim of this study was to determine whether remimazolam provides superior procedural sedation in Japanese patients. Methods: The cohort of this prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blind controlled trial comprised adults (18–80 years) scheduled for sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Participants were randomized to remimazolam and midazolam groups. The primary outcome was the proportion of ambulatory patients 5 min after endoscopy. Secondary outcomes were successful pre-procedure sedation (Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation ≤ 4), dose of sedative to achieve sedation, time to ambulation, and adverse events. Results: From October 2024 to January 2025, 40 patients were enrolled. After excluding two outliers 38 were analyzed (remimazolam, n = 20; midazolam, n = 18). Ambulation at 5 min occurred in 85.0% (17/20) of the remimazolam versus 0.0% (0/18) of the midazolam group (p < 0.0001). Mean time from procedure end to walking was 4.25 min (range 0.0–10.0) for remimazolam and 35.56 min (10.0–60.0) for midazolam (p < 0.0001). Pre-procedure sedation was successful (MOAA/S ≤ 4) in 100% of both groups. Mean doses to achieve sedation were 4.30 mg (3.0–7.0) for remimazolam and 3.11 mg (2.0–5.0) for midazolam (p = 0.003). Hypoxemia occurred in 5.0% of the remimazolam and 33.3% of the midazolam group (p = 0.038). Conclusions: In upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, remimazolam achieved markedly faster recovery and a lower incidence of hypoxemia than midazolam. Rates of achieving target sedation were equivalent. These findings indicate remimazolam is an effective and potentially safer sedative option for Japanese patients undergoing endoscopy. Trial registration: This research was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (trial number jRCTs071240062) on September 26, 2024.
AB - Objectives: Sedation is increasingly essential for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, has a shorter pharmacokinetic half-life than midazolam. The aim of this study was to determine whether remimazolam provides superior procedural sedation in Japanese patients. Methods: The cohort of this prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blind controlled trial comprised adults (18–80 years) scheduled for sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Participants were randomized to remimazolam and midazolam groups. The primary outcome was the proportion of ambulatory patients 5 min after endoscopy. Secondary outcomes were successful pre-procedure sedation (Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation ≤ 4), dose of sedative to achieve sedation, time to ambulation, and adverse events. Results: From October 2024 to January 2025, 40 patients were enrolled. After excluding two outliers 38 were analyzed (remimazolam, n = 20; midazolam, n = 18). Ambulation at 5 min occurred in 85.0% (17/20) of the remimazolam versus 0.0% (0/18) of the midazolam group (p < 0.0001). Mean time from procedure end to walking was 4.25 min (range 0.0–10.0) for remimazolam and 35.56 min (10.0–60.0) for midazolam (p < 0.0001). Pre-procedure sedation was successful (MOAA/S ≤ 4) in 100% of both groups. Mean doses to achieve sedation were 4.30 mg (3.0–7.0) for remimazolam and 3.11 mg (2.0–5.0) for midazolam (p = 0.003). Hypoxemia occurred in 5.0% of the remimazolam and 33.3% of the midazolam group (p = 0.038). Conclusions: In upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, remimazolam achieved markedly faster recovery and a lower incidence of hypoxemia than midazolam. Rates of achieving target sedation were equivalent. These findings indicate remimazolam is an effective and potentially safer sedative option for Japanese patients undergoing endoscopy. Trial registration: This research was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (trial number jRCTs071240062) on September 26, 2024.
KW - Midazolam
KW - MOAA/S score
KW - Remimazolam
KW - Sedation
KW - Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022297056
U2 - 10.1007/s00535-025-02324-x
DO - 10.1007/s00535-025-02324-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 41247517
AN - SCOPUS:105022297056
SN - 0944-1174
JO - Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - Journal of Gastroenterology
ER -