Correction to: Comparison between CT volumetry and extracellular volume fraction using liver dynamic CT for the predictive ability of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (European Radiology, (2022), 32, 11, (7555-7565), 10.1007/s00330-022-08852-x)

Correction to: European Radiology (2022) 32:7555–7565https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08852-x published online 20 May 2022 In this article various text corrections were necessary: In section “Laboratory data” the phrase “, albumin-bilirubin grade (ALBI grade),” was added after the sentence beginning with “The aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index (APRI)”. The complete sentence reads: “The aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index (APRI), albumin-bilirubin grade (ALBI grade), and fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) were computed as representative serum test-based fibrosis markers.” In section “Discussion” in the sentence beginning with “AUC value of TLV/BSA was 0.74–0.77,” “TLV/BSA” was changed to “TLV/SV”. The correct sentence reads: “AUC value of TLV/SV was 0.74–0.77, which was more effective in estimating LF than LSVR (0.59–0.63).” In section “Discussion” in the sentence beginning with “In comparison, in our study, the candidates for surgical liver resection” HBV and HCV should have been exchanged. The correct sentence reads: “In comparison, in our study, the candidates for surgical liver resection were patients with HCV (22 of 80, 27.5%) and HBV (21 of 80, 26.3%).” In section “Figure legend (Fig 1)” the sentences, “Anatomical misregistration was not shown. The ROI of the abdominal aorta (area 61 mm²) and the portal vein (area 61 mm²)” were placed. In Conclusions of Abstract, the sentence beginning with, “In patients…” was changed from (≥F4) to (F4). In the last paragraph of section CT volumetry, the last sentence beginning with “AUC of SV/BSA showed..” is changed from (≥ F4) to (F4). In the last paragraph of section Comparison between ECV and CTV for estimation of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, the last sentence beginning with “There was no..” was changed from (≥ F4) to (F4). In the last paragraph of Discussion, the sentence beginning, “In particular…” was changed from (≥F4) to (F4). The original article has been corrected.