TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial Intelligence and Image Analysis-Assisted Diagnosis for Fibrosis Stage of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Using Ultrasonography
T2 - A Pilot Study
AU - Fujii, Itsuki
AU - Matsumoto, Naoki
AU - Ogawa, Masahiro
AU - Konishi, Aya
AU - Kaneko, Masahiro
AU - Watanabe, Yukinobu
AU - Masuzaki, Ryota
AU - Kogure, Hirofumi
AU - Koizumi, Norihiro
AU - Sugitani, Masahiko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Background/Objectives: Elastography increased the diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis. However, several challenges persist, including the widespread utilization of equipment, difficulties in measuring certain cases, and the influence of viscosity factors. A rough surface and a blunted hepatic margin have long been acknowledged as valuable characteristics indicative of hepatic fibrosis. The objective of this study was to conduct an image analysis and quantitative assessment of the contour of the sagittal section of the left lobe of the liver. Methods: Between February and October 2020, 486 consecutive outpatients underwent ultrasound examinations at our hospital. A total of 214 images were manually annotated by delineating the liver contour to create annotation images. U-Net was employed for liver segmentation, with the dataset divided into training (n = 128), testing (n = 42), and validation (n = 44) subsets. Additionally, 43 Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) cases with pathology data from between 2015 and 2020 were included. Segmentation was performed using the program developed in the first step. Subsequently, shape analysis was conducted using ImageJ. Results: Liver segmentation exhibited high accuracy, as indicated by Dice loss of 0.044, Intersection over Union of 0.935, and an F score of 0.966. The accuracy of the classification of the liver surface as smooth or rough via ResNet 50 was 84.6%. Image analysis showed MinFeret and Minor correlated with liver fibrosis stage (p = 0.046, 0.036, respectively). Sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of Minor for ≥F3 were 0.571, 0.862, and 0.722, respectively, and F4 were 1, 0.600, and 0.825, respectively. Conclusion: Deep learning segmentation of the sagittal cross-sectional contour of the left lobe of the liver demonstrated commendable accuracy. The roughness of the liver surface was correctly judged by artificial intelligence. Image analysis showed the thickness of the left lobe inversely correlated with liver fibrosis stage.
AB - Background/Objectives: Elastography increased the diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis. However, several challenges persist, including the widespread utilization of equipment, difficulties in measuring certain cases, and the influence of viscosity factors. A rough surface and a blunted hepatic margin have long been acknowledged as valuable characteristics indicative of hepatic fibrosis. The objective of this study was to conduct an image analysis and quantitative assessment of the contour of the sagittal section of the left lobe of the liver. Methods: Between February and October 2020, 486 consecutive outpatients underwent ultrasound examinations at our hospital. A total of 214 images were manually annotated by delineating the liver contour to create annotation images. U-Net was employed for liver segmentation, with the dataset divided into training (n = 128), testing (n = 42), and validation (n = 44) subsets. Additionally, 43 Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) cases with pathology data from between 2015 and 2020 were included. Segmentation was performed using the program developed in the first step. Subsequently, shape analysis was conducted using ImageJ. Results: Liver segmentation exhibited high accuracy, as indicated by Dice loss of 0.044, Intersection over Union of 0.935, and an F score of 0.966. The accuracy of the classification of the liver surface as smooth or rough via ResNet 50 was 84.6%. Image analysis showed MinFeret and Minor correlated with liver fibrosis stage (p = 0.046, 0.036, respectively). Sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of Minor for ≥F3 were 0.571, 0.862, and 0.722, respectively, and F4 were 1, 0.600, and 0.825, respectively. Conclusion: Deep learning segmentation of the sagittal cross-sectional contour of the left lobe of the liver demonstrated commendable accuracy. The roughness of the liver surface was correctly judged by artificial intelligence. Image analysis showed the thickness of the left lobe inversely correlated with liver fibrosis stage.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - fatty liver
KW - image analysis
KW - liver fibrosis
KW - metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease
KW - ultrasonography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210166950&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics14222585
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics14222585
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85210166950
SN - 2075-4418
VL - 14
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
IS - 22
M1 - 2585
ER -