TY - JOUR
T1 - 大腸腫瘍に対する従来型 ESD および牽引 ESD の無作為化比較試験(CONNECT-C 試験)
AU - Ichijima, Ryoji
AU - Ikehara, Hisatomo
AU - Sumida, Yorinobu
AU - Inada, Taisuke
AU - Nemoto, Daiki
AU - Nakajima, Yuki
AU - Minagawa, Takeyoshi
AU - Sumiyoshi, Tetsuya
AU - Inoki, Kazuya
AU - Yoshida, Naohisa
AU - Inoue, Ken
AU - Fukuzawa, Masakatsu
AU - Minoda, Yosuke
AU - Tsutsumi, Koshiro
AU - Esaki, Mitsuru
AU - Gotoda, Takuji
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Objectives: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely used treatment for early gastrointestinal cancer. However, colon ESD remains challenging. Previous studies on colon ESD using the traction method used a small sample, single-center design, providing insufficient evidence of this procedure's efficacy. We thus aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the traction method in colon ESD in this multicenter randomized trial. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, two-arm controlled trial at 10 facilities in Japan. A 1:1 allocation was conducted for the conventional ESD (C-ESD) and traction ESD (T-ESD) groups. The primary end-point was ESD procedure time. Results: We included 128 C-ESD and 123 T-ESD cases from April 2020 to August 2021. The median procedure times for C-ESD and T-ESD were 61 (40-100) and 53 (40-76) min (p = 0.18), respectively, and no significant differences were observed between the groups. Subgroup analysis showed that the median procedure times for patients with a lesion diameter of ≥30 mm in the C-ESD and T-ESD groups were 89 (57-80) and 69 (50-104) min (p = 0.05), respectively, and for nonexpert operators were 81 (62-120) and 64 (52-109) min (p = 0.07), respectively. Conclusions: The traction method did not contribute to a significantly shortened ESD procedure time. However, this method may be useful when the tumor diameter is large or if the procedure is conducted by nonexpert endoscopists.
AB - Objectives: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely used treatment for early gastrointestinal cancer. However, colon ESD remains challenging. Previous studies on colon ESD using the traction method used a small sample, single-center design, providing insufficient evidence of this procedure's efficacy. We thus aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the traction method in colon ESD in this multicenter randomized trial. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, two-arm controlled trial at 10 facilities in Japan. A 1:1 allocation was conducted for the conventional ESD (C-ESD) and traction ESD (T-ESD) groups. The primary end-point was ESD procedure time. Results: We included 128 C-ESD and 123 T-ESD cases from April 2020 to August 2021. The median procedure times for C-ESD and T-ESD were 61 (40-100) and 53 (40-76) min (p = 0.18), respectively, and no significant differences were observed between the groups. Subgroup analysis showed that the median procedure times for patients with a lesion diameter of ≥30 mm in the C-ESD and T-ESD groups were 89 (57-80) and 69 (50-104) min (p = 0.05), respectively, and for nonexpert operators were 81 (62-120) and 64 (52-109) min (p = 0.07), respectively. Conclusions: The traction method did not contribute to a significantly shortened ESD procedure time. However, this method may be useful when the tumor diameter is large or if the procedure is conducted by nonexpert endoscopists.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185606246&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11280/gee.66.78
DO - 10.11280/gee.66.78
M3 - 記事
AN - SCOPUS:85185606246
SN - 0387-1207
VL - 66
SP - 78
EP - 88
JO - Gastroenterological Endoscopy
JF - Gastroenterological Endoscopy
IS - 1
ER -